[ldv-project] [PATCH] usb/core/devio.c: Don't use GFP_KERNEL while we cannot reset a storage device

Alan Stern stern at rowland.harvard.edu
Mon Mar 11 20:08:46 MSK 2013


On Mon, 11 Mar 2013, Ming Lei wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Alan Stern <stern at rowland.harvard.edu> wrote:
> >
> > Of course you have to lock the device before changing its driver.  What
> > would happen if two different threads tried to change a device's driver
> > at the same time?
> 
> Yes, claim/release interface need device lock, but the patch doesn't
> touch claim/release command handling.

Then why did you ask?  You wrote: "Looks device lock isn't required for
USB transfer of kernel driver."


> > usbdev_do_ioctl() needs to acquire the device lock in order to prevent
> > races with driver_disconnect() and usbdev_remove().
> 
> Looks the patch basically converts the allocation inside URB submit path,
> and actually I mean why we need to hold device lock in submitting
> URB path?  Device lock isn't required before submitting URBs
> in kernel driver.

In general it isn't, no.  But usbfs uses the lock to prevent races with 
driver_disconnect() -- it is invalid to submit URBs after the 
disconnect routine has returned.

Alan Stern




More information about the ldv-project mailing list