[lvc-project] [PATCH v2 2/2] MIPS: BCM63xx: Add check for NULL for clk in clk_enable
Florian Fainelli
f.fainelli at gmail.com
Wed Dec 7 21:23:19 MSK 2022
On 12/7/22 07:53, Alexey Khoroshilov wrote:
> On 07.12.2022 17:28, Anastasia Belova wrote:
>> Errors from previous version of patch fixed.
>> Check clk for NULL before calling clk_enable_unlocked where clk
>> is dereferenced. There is such check in other implementations
>> of clk_enable.
>>
>> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
>> Fixes: e7300d04bd08 ("MIPS: BCM63xx: Add support for the Broadcom BCM63xx family of SOCs.")
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp at intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Anastasia Belova <abelova at astralinux.ru>
>> ---
>> arch/mips/bcm63xx/clk.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/mips/bcm63xx/clk.c b/arch/mips/bcm63xx/clk.c
>> index 401140cf36d9..cf303d6e6693 100644
>> --- a/arch/mips/bcm63xx/clk.c
>> +++ b/arch/mips/bcm63xx/clk.c
>> @@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ static struct clk clk_periph = {
>> int clk_enable(struct clk *clk)
>> {
>> if (!clk)
>> - return;
>> + return 0;
>>
>> mutex_lock(&clocks_mutex);
>> clk_enable_unlocked(clk);
>>
>
> Keeping in mind that the first patch is not applied yet, it does not
> make sense to fix it by the second one. It is better to fix the first
> patch itself by sending the next version.
Exactly, you would to combine both patches into a single patch and send
that as a version 3 now.
--
Florian
More information about the lvc-project
mailing list