[lvc-project] [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v3] ice: Adjust over allocation of memory in ice_sched_add_root_node() and ice_sched_add_node()

[Paul Menzel]

Dear Przemek,


Thank you for your quick reply.


Am 09.07.24 um 11:11 schrieb Przemek Kitszel:
> On 7/9/24 10:54, Paul Menzel wrote:
>> [Cc: -anirudh.venkataramanan at intel.com (Address rejected)]
>>
>> Am 09.07.24 um 10:49 schrieb Paul Menzel:

>>> Am 08.07.24 um 20:27 schrieb Aleksandr Mishin:
>>>> In ice_sched_add_root_node() and ice_sched_add_node() there are calls to
>>>> devm_kcalloc() in order to allocate memory for array of pointers to
>>>> 'ice_sched_node' structure. But incorrect types are used as sizeof()
>>>> arguments in these calls (structures instead of pointers) which leads to
>>>> over allocation of memory.
>>>
>>> If you have the explicit size at hand, it’d be great if you added 
>>> those to the commit message.
>>>
>>>> Adjust over allocation of memory by correcting types in devm_kcalloc()
>>>> sizeof() arguments.
>>>>
>>>> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
>>>
>>> Maybe mention, that Coverity found that too, and the warning was 
>>> disabled, and use that commit in Fixes: tag? That’d be commit 
>>> b36c598c999c (ice: Updates to Tx scheduler code), different from the 
>>> one you used.
> 
> this version does not have any SHA mentioned :)

Sorry, I don’t understand your answer. What SHA do you mean?

>>> `Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst` says:
>>>
>>>> A Fixes: tag indicates that the patch fixes an issue in a previous
>>>> commit. It is used to make it easy to determine where a bug
>>>> originated, which can help review a bug fix. This tag also assists
>>>> the stable kernel team in determining which stable kernel versions
>>>> should receive your fix. This is the preferred method for indicating
>>>> a bug fixed by the patch.
> 
> so, this is not a "fix" per definition of a fix: "your patch changes
> observable misbehavior"
> If the over-allocation would be counted in megabytes, then it will
> be a different case.

The quoted text just talks about “an issue”. What definition do you 
refer to?


Kind regards,

Paul