[lvc-project] [PATCH v2 2/2] ocfs2: validate cl_bpc in allocator inodes to prevent divide-by-zero
Joseph Qi
joseph.qi at linux.alibaba.com
Fri Oct 31 11:32:29 MSK 2025
On 2025/10/30 23:30, Dmitry Antipov wrote:
> From: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406 at gmail.com>
>
> The chain allocator field cl_bpc (blocks per cluster) is read from disk
> and used in division operations without validation. A corrupted filesystem
> image with cl_bpc=0 causes a divide-by-zero crash in the kernel:
>
> divide error: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN
> RIP: 0010:ocfs2_bg_discontig_add_extent fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c:335 [inline]
> RIP: 0010:ocfs2_block_group_fill+0x5bd/0xa70 fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c:386
> Call Trace:
> ocfs2_block_group_alloc+0x7e9/0x1330 fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c:703
> ocfs2_reserve_suballoc_bits+0x20a6/0x4640 fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c:834
> ocfs2_reserve_new_inode+0x4f4/0xcc0 fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c:1074
> ocfs2_mknod+0x83c/0x2050 fs/ocfs2/namei.c:306
>
> This patch adds validation in ocfs2_validate_inode_block() to ensure cl_bpc
> matches the expected value calculated from the superblock's cluster size
> and block size for chain allocator inodes (identified by OCFS2_CHAIN_FL).
>
> Moving the validation to inode validation time (rather than allocation time)
> has several benefits:
> - Validates once when the inode is read, rather than on every allocation
> - Protects all code paths that use cl_bpc (allocation, resize, etc.)
> - Follows the existing pattern of inode validation in OCFS2
> - Centralizes validation logic
>
> The validation catches both:
> - Zero values that cause divide-by-zero crashes
> - Non-zero but incorrect values indicating filesystem corruption or
> mismatched filesystem geometry
>
> With this fix, mounting a corrupted filesystem produces:
>
> OCFS2: ERROR (device loop0): ocfs2_validate_inode_block: Inode 74
> has corrupted cl_bpc: ondisk=0 expected=16
>
> instead of a kernel crash.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/ocfs2-devel/20251026132625.12348-1-kartikey406@gmail.com/T/#u [v1]
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251027124131.10002-1-kartikey406@gmail.com/T/ [v2]
> Reported-by: syzbot+fd8af97c7227fe605d95 at syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=fd8af97c7227fe605d95
> Tested-by: syzbot+fd8af97c7227fe605d95 at syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Suggested-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi at linux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406 at gmail.com>
> [dmantipov: combine into the series and tweak
> the message to fit the commonly used style]
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov at yandex.ru>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi at linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> v2: add extra check to bypass global bitmap dinode (Joseph Qi)
> ---
> fs/ocfs2/inode.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/inode.c b/fs/ocfs2/inode.c
> index 1b6bdd9d7755..08e18be4f1b9 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/inode.c
> @@ -1505,6 +1505,8 @@ int ocfs2_validate_inode_block(struct super_block *sb,
>
> if (le32_to_cpu(di->i_flags) & OCFS2_CHAIN_FL) {
> struct ocfs2_chain_list *cl = &di->id2.i_chain;
> + u16 bpc = 1 << (OCFS2_SB(sb)->s_clustersize_bits -
> + sb->s_blocksize_bits);
>
> if (le16_to_cpu(cl->cl_count) != ocfs2_chain_recs_per_inode(sb)) {
> rc = ocfs2_error(sb, "Invalid dinode %llu: chain list count %u\n",
> @@ -1518,6 +1520,14 @@ int ocfs2_validate_inode_block(struct super_block *sb,
> le16_to_cpu(cl->cl_next_free_rec));
> goto bail;
> }
> + if (OCFS2_SB(sb)->bitmap_blkno &&
> + OCFS2_SB(sb)->bitmap_blkno != le64_to_cpu(di->i_blkno) &&
> + le16_to_cpu(cl->cl_bpc) != bpc) {
> + rc = ocfs2_error(sb, "Invalid dinode %llu: bits per cluster %u\n",
> + (unsigned long long)bh->b_blocknr,
> + le16_to_cpu(cl->cl_bpc));
> + goto bail;
> + }
> }
>
> rc = 0;
More information about the lvc-project
mailing list