[lvc-project] [PATCH v5] scsi: fill in DMA padding bytes in scsi_alloc_sgtables
Bart Van Assche
bvanassche at acm.org
Wed Jul 22 21:27:48 MSK 2026
On 6/28/26 11:52 AM, Petr Vaganov wrote:
> During fuzz testing, the following issue was discovered:
>
> BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in __dma_map_sg_attrs+0x217/0x310
> __dma_map_sg_attrs+0x217/0x310
> dma_map_sg_attrs+0x4a/0x70
> ata_qc_issue+0x9f8/0x1420
> __ata_scsi_queuecmd+0x1657/0x1740
> ata_scsi_queuecmd+0x79a/0x920
> scsi_queue_rq+0x4472/0x4f40
> blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list+0x1cca/0x3ee0
> __blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x458/0x630
> blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x15b/0x340
> __blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0xe5/0x250
> __blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue+0x138/0x780
> blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x4bb/0x7e0
> blk_mq_sched_insert_request+0x2a7/0x4c0
> blk_execute_rq+0x497/0x8a0
> sg_io+0xbe0/0xe20
> scsi_ioctl+0x2b36/0x3c60
> sr_block_ioctl+0x319/0x440
> blkdev_ioctl+0x80f/0xd70
> __se_sys_ioctl+0x219/0x420
> __x64_sys_ioctl+0x93/0xe0
> x64_sys_call+0x1d6c/0x3ad0
> do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xa0
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8
dma_map_sg_attrs() shouldn't touch the data buffer. Is the above warning
triggered because of the kmsan_handle_dma_sg() call in
__dma_map_sg_attrs()?
> last_sg->length += pad_len;
> + sg_zero_buffer(last_sg, 1, pad_len, data_len);
> cmd->extra_len += pad_len;
Shouldn't sg_zero_buffer() only be called if CONFIG_UBSAN is enabled to
prevent that this call negatively affects I/O performance?
Thanks,
Bart.
More information about the lvc-project
mailing list