[rulkc] [RFC] Should we consider to re-write HFS/HFS+ in Rust?
Viacheslav Dubeyko
slava at dubeyko.com
Wed Jun 11 03:26:58 MSK 2025
Hello,
One idea crossed my mind recently. And this is about re-writing
HFS/HFS+ in Rust. It could be interesting direction but I am not sure
how reasonable it could be. From one point of view, HFS/HFS+ are not
critical subsystems and we can afford some experiments. From another
point of view, we have enough issues in the HFS/HFS+ code and, maybe,
re-working HFS/HFS+ can make the code more stable.
I don't think that it's a good idea to implement the complete re-
writing of the whole driver at once. However, we need a some
unification and generalization of HFS/HFS+ code patterns in the form of
re-usable code by both drivers. This re-usable code can be represented
as by C code as by Rust code. And we can introduce this generalized
code in the form of C and Rust at the same time. So, we can re-write
HFS/HFS+ code gradually step by step. My point here that we could have
C code and Rust code for generalized functionality of HFS/HFS+ and
Kconfig would define which code will be compiled and used, finally.
How do you feel about this? And can we afford such implementation
efforts?
Thanks,
Slava.
More information about the rulkc
mailing list